LangChain and LangGraph are tools for developers to build agents. The difference is who writes the code, who puts it into production and who looks after it afterwards.
Side by side
| Criteria | LangChain and LangGraph | Agent in your operations |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source libraries for developers to build AI applications and agents. | An agent ready for your process, with no coding required on your side. |
| Who does the work | A development team writes, tests and ships the agent. | We build and test it with the people who do the work. |
| Your systems | Connects to whatever your team codes. | Connected to your ERP, CRM, WhatsApp, email and spreadsheets. |
| Control | Whatever the development team builds. | You approve what matters. Everything is logged. |
| Who builds and maintains it | Your development team, with no end date. | We monitor and fine-tune it every month, with documentation. |
| Results | Depends on having dedicated technical people. | Hours given back and money saved, measured every month. |
Based on public information about each tool, checked in October 2026 · names and trademarks belong to their owners
When building with them makes sense
When an agent makes more sense
You can use both: if you already have something in LangChain or LangGraph, we can start from there.
FAQ
When it makes sense, yes. We choose the technology based on the process. The code and documentation stay with you.
No. We handle the technical side. On your side, all you need is someone who knows the process.
You can. Everything we built stays with you: the agents, the rules and the documentation.
Other comparisons